Does Astros To AL Mean No More DH?

Christina Kharl of ESPN.com on the Astros moving to the AL:

The argument from the players’ perspective for keeping the DH has always been about compensation — in the abstract, they’re protecting the interests of 14 jobs open to well-paid veteran players. But who are today’s DHs? Not Jorge Posada, he just lost his gig in New York. And not Jim Thome — he risked a move back to the NL. Are we really down to just David Ortiz as the lone example of a DH who lives up to the name? OK, there’s also Billy Butler in Kansas City.

The argument is a good one. The DH isn’t so much as a regular position as much as it is a place to hide aging veterans (Posada), the occasionaly no-glove/all-hit guy (Butler) or to rest guys without losing their bat.

As the fan of an AL team, I really don’t care all that much. I do find the strategy required when the pitcher is batting to be a boost, so I definitely wouldn’t mind the demise of the DH.

(Click to view source article)

± Permalink

MLB May Implement Subscription For iOS Apps

Kelly Hodgkins of TUAW on the MLB iOS app:

Speaking with Fortune, MLB.com CEO Bob Bowman said they could add new features as a monthly subscription which would be available in-season and could be canceled when your favorite team is doing poorly.

My frustrations with the MLB At-Bat iOS app is that it has steadily increased in price since it’s inception, all the way put to $15 this season. As a result I opted not to buy it at all this season. While I won’t question that it’s probably quicker to get to schedules and scores than any other application, other free options aren’t that much worse.

The idea of paying a monthly fee instead of a cost up-front for the app is a good solution I suppose. If they make it $5 a month they will only need to average 3 months per customer to make their money back. It seems unlikely that most fans would give up before the end of June, and I for one would welcome the chance to pay for it just the months I need/want it.

(Click to view source article)

± Permalink

CBS Shortens Rules of Engagement Season

Chris Harnick of AOL TV on CBS’ Rules of Engagement:

According to Deadline, CBS has cut the episode order for the long-running sitcom from 18 to 13. ‘Rules’ had two episode held from last season, so Season 6 will now run 15 episodes as opposed to 20.

My opinion is that Rules of Engagement is the most underrated comedy on TV. I hope this isn’t the beginning of the end. I won’t be crushed if it ends because Adam is so stupid that I am growing tired of it, but still it’s a good show.

(Click to view source article)

± Permalink

The Case Against Paying Matt Forte

Let me preface this by saying that I have nothing against Matt Forte. I obviously do not know him, and for all intensive purposes, what I am about to say has nothing to do with him. If you replaced Matt Forte’s name in the following post with Marion Barber, Raymont Harris or Bill Simmons, I wouldn’t change a thing.

Now that we have that out of the way, let me just say that I am not of the opinion that Matt Forte should get a big contract extension. Not because he doesn’t “deserve it” but because that is not what’s best for the Chicago Bears, and that is all I care about.

First and foremost, the idea of a franchise running back is dying. As the rules continue to slant in favor of passing attacks it seems like more and more teams are getting by with a random running back, sometimes off the scrap heap. Take some of the better teams of the last decades and look at the number of playoff appearances and the number of different leading rushers for the regular season in those playoff years:

  • New England: 8 playoff appearances/4 different leading rushers
  • Pittsburgh: 7/4
  • Indianapolis: 9/3
  • Philadelphia: 8/3
  • Baltimore: 6/4
  • Green Bay: 7/3
  • San Diego: 5/1
  • Seattle: 6/2

So of all the teams that made the playoffs at least 5 times in the last 10 seasons, they combined for 56 playoff appearances and 24 different leading rushers. That’s one leading rusher for every 2.3 playoff appearances. Clearly having a consistent guy in the backfield isn’t a huge deal.

What if we go back through the last few Super Bowl Champs:

  • 2010, Green Bay, Brandon Jackson: 16 starts in 4+ seasons. 1329 career rushing yards.
  • 2009, New Orleans, Pierre Thomas: 793 yards in 2009; 19 starts in 4+seasons; never cracked 1000 yard season
  • 2008, Pittsburgh, Willie Parker: Out of football after 6 seasons; three 1000 yard seasons, but none since 2007
  • 2007, New York Giants, Brandon Jacobs: Two 1000 yard seasons including 2007; 44 starts in 7 seasons
  • 2006, Indianapolis: Joseph Addai: Two 1000 yard seasons, ’06 and ’07; 4 straight under 1000 since
  • 2005, Pittsburgh: Willie Parker: see above
  • 2004, New England, Corey Dillon: 11,000+ career yards; 8 1000 yard seasons out of 10

So if you are keeping score you have to go all the way back to 2004 to find a team that won the Super Bowl with what could be considered a franchise running back, and that was 30-year old Corey Dillon, signed as a free agent that offseason and 2 years from retirement. Seeing as Parker lasted just 6 seasons it’s hard to consider him a franchise back.

Then there are the financial implications. Giving Forte a big deal will limit the Bears’ flexibility going forward. This is a team with a guy who had potential to be a franchise quarterback, and who, so far this season, has looked like one. A 28-year old who has just two seasons left on his contract, and if it’s for real will be looking for a big salary boost in 2014. Meanwhile, the Bears remain without a “go to” WR, with Johnny Knox and Earl Bennett looking like the closest to fitting that mold, but injuries and inconsistency making it seem unlikely either gets over the hump.

Then there is the aging defense that can only rely on both Brian Urlacher keeping his quick first step for so long, and Lance Briggs’ keeping his contract complaints to himself. Thus far Major Wright appears the only “young” player on defense with any long-term upside and the four best defenders are on the wrong side of 30. Unless the Bears turn their draft fortunes around, rebuilding this team will require money. The jury is still out on surprise starting LT J’Marcus Webb, but first round tackles Chris Williams (2008) and Gabe Carimi (2011) have already battled injuries their entire careers, meaning that at the moment there are three offensive line positions in question.

The current rules of the NFL collective bargaining agreement (CBA) contain a rookie salary scale that help set Forte’s existing contract. Forte’s rookie contract ends at the of this season, but that doesn’t mean he is guaranteed a new long-term contract. NFL CBA rules allow players to have the “franchise tag” placed on them. This tag applies for one season and guarantees a player a salary based on the average of the top 5 players at his position. The pro to this for the player is that they are guaranteed all of that money, whereas normal contracts have limited guaranteed money. The con is that they have no security beyond the first season.

This tag can only be applied to one player per team, per season and can only be applied to the same player by the same team two times in a row. What this ultimately means though, is that the Bears can opt to not sign Forte to a new contract and still keep him for the next two seasons. Even though they would quite possibly pay him a higher base salary over those two years, they will still save on guaranteed money in the long run.

This is surely the way to go. While it would cause unrest with Forte (more on that in a bit) it is the best decision for a lot of reasons. First and foremost, it has a built-in security policy against injury or skill degradation. Second it helps support the aforementioned financial flexibility.

I understand that Forte wouldn’t be happy with this decision, but that is somewhat irrelevant. The CBA includes the ability for teams to use the franchise tag in this manner, and it’s pretty rare that a player is happy it’s used on him. They could have fought harder to have it removed but I assume since it only affects at most 30 players per year it wasn’t a high priority. He is well aware of the fact that NFL careers are often short and could basically end at any time, and that he needs to establish some long term financial stability as soon as possible, but that is not likely what is best for the Bears.

As horrible as it sounds, having a player who is essentially in a “contract year” for three seasons will make them extra motivated so that they can ensure that big payday eventually comes. If Forte were to suffer a catastrophic injury I would feel bad for him, but as a Bears fan I would be happier that we weren’t locked in to paying him forever.

Forte has had an amazing career so far. I was stunned to find out that he is currently 24th in rushing yards amongst active players, ahead of Ray Rice and Rashard Mendenhall, both who were rookies with Forte, but are both actually 2 years younger. At the moment Forte has looked like a top 5 running back, but until the Bears have to pay him, I don’t think they should. It’s not in the best interest of the team, and as a fan, that’s all that matters to me.

Most Amazing Punt Return Ever

Joe Adams of the Arkansas Razorbacks pulls off the most amazing punt return I think I have ever seen. I guess you could also blame it on totally inept tackling, but I prefer to give Adams the credit.

(Click to view source article)

± Permalink

Killing Mobile Flash Is Just The Beginning

Marco Arment on Adobe killing Flash:

If web developers must make non-Flash implementations of everything, why bother making the Flash versions at all? This isn’t just the death of mobile Flash: it’s a confirmation from Adobe that all Flash is on its way out.

People mocked Apple when they decided not to put Flash support on the iPhone. Their decision not to include it in Lion was also a bit of a surprise. 4.5 years later Adobe has given on Mobile Flash, and as Marco says, Flash as a whole won’t be too far behind. My guess is that sites that are Flash only will be mocked and ridiculed within 2 years the same way that sites with excessive clip art and the blink tag are mocked now.

(Click to view source article)

± Permalink

Choosing A Phone Is A Personal Decision

Marco Arment on smartphones:

Smartphones have too many subjective criteria, and even the measurable stats don’t always yield a definite answer on what’s better. If you want a huge screen, you’ll get a huge phone, so is a larger screen size a good thing or not? Fast 4G network access kills battery life, so is 4G a good feature for you? Do you want the best normal camera, or a lower-quality 3D camera? Do you want any particular apps or games that are only available on one platform? Do you need a kickstand? (Do they still make those?) These all depend on your priorities.

Emphasis mine. When people ask me if they should get an iPhone, I always tell them that I can’t answer that for them. Choosing a phone is way to much of a personal choice that depends on personal factors. The things I would rang with highest importance are not likely the same things someone else might.

(Click to view source article)

± Permalink

Episode #26: LSU vs. Alabama and Video Game Marathon 2010

We begin with a discussion of the “Game of the Century” between LSU and Alabama. How good was it? Was the backlash called for? Then we are joined by Dave to discuss the 24-hour video game marathon the three of us participated in last season.

XBOX Live Gamertags:

  • Dave – MagicBus578
  • Chris – cmwilliams5151
  • Hippo – BeserkHippo

Guests:  Chris (http://twitter.com/cmwilliams51) and Dave (http://twitter.com/dpbus)

Running Time: About 33 minutes

Download: Direct | iTunes

Subscribe: iTunes | RSS Feed

Episode Links:

Theme music by FantomenK

One Penn St. Fan’s Thoughts

[From the CEO: The following is the first guest post on the site, from none other then podcast partner, and die hard Penn St. fan Chris. These are Chris' opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Berserk Hippo]

Being the biggest Penn State football fan many people know, the last few days I have been repeatedly asked how this scandal affects me and my fandom. I figured I would weigh in with my thoughts and opinions on the matter. I need to stress that these are my opinions. Everyone is entitled to their own. These opinions are based on the information as it is known at the time of this post. It must also be noted that I am a Penn State fan and I am certainly not looking at this as a complete outsider.

Why do I love Penn State? I grew up in Chicago. I did not attend Penn State and didn’t visit the campus until I was 20, but for as long I can remember I have been a fan. My love of Penn State did not start because of a family member passing it down or a geographic sense of loyalty – it was based on a logo. I was about 10 years old when I first saw the Penn State logo – the oval lion head design. Lionlogo I loved it. That’s where my love of Penn State began. I soon started to watch and learn about the football team. I loved the plain uniforms. I loved watching them in 1994 with Ki-Jana Carter and Kerry Collins. I soon learned about Joe Paterno and I loved JoePa too.

Joe Paterno was everything that was right about football. He did everything the right way and always set a terrific example. He was extremely successful as a Division 1 football coach and could have gone on to bigger jobs, but decided he could do the most good at Penn State. He also ran an incredibly clean program. There were never stories about problems with boosters or recruiting violations at Penn State. He did everything above board. He regularly kicked players off the team if they did not comply with his way of doing things. He always said his goal was to develop these players into good men first and foremost and then to make them into good football players. I admired this. I admired what he built at Penn State. I think it is a consensus opinion that up until about 5 days ago, Joe Paterno was the epitome of a college football coach and of a man. He spent 60+ years making Penn State great and affecting thousands (maybe millions) of individuals in a positive way.

Saying all of this, he probably handled the Sandusky 2002 shower situation incorrectly. An inappropriate activity was reported to him (as I write this, we still do not know what exactly was told to Paterno) and he did exactly what he was legally obligated to do – report it to his superiors. This sounds to me like he immediately consulted with an attorney (either personal or the school’s) and followed the advice given. We live in an extremely litigious society (I would know) and there may have been ramifications considered in the event that this turned out to be less serious than it was. He would, in essence, have been alleging abuse and possibly opening up civil liability for himself and the school. While there is the question of a moral responsibility, from a legal standpoint, he did everything correctly.

My major issue here is the immediate, rapid-fire news cycle that has developed. Everyone is quick to skewer Paterno and go on and on about how they would have done things differently. This is all with the benefit of hindsight. We still don’t know exactly what Paterno was told. We have access to the grand jury report, but not to Paterno’s actual testimony. I am certain that Paterno will address this in the near future, but until then, it is imprudent to rush to judgment. Even though this is true, it seems as if everyone in the media and beyond has gone out and rushed to judgment.

If all of the allegations are true, Sandusky is a monster, plain and simple. That is what everyone knows now. At the time of this incident, the perception was that Sandusky was a great friend to the program. He was a man who started a charity and helped children (sick when looking back, but in the time would have seemed admirable). This was a guy who had adopted a number of children and who was seen around campus with the other kids that he was purportedly helping (we now know otherwise). He was a member of the Penn State family for nearly 30 years and a big reason why the Penn State is known as Linebacker U. I don’t know this for sure, but I’d imagine he was a close friend to Paterno.

Taking all of this into consideration, I can see how difficult it would be for Paterno when he was given this information. First of all, did he believe it? In my heart of hearts, and based on the fact that Paterno is such an outstanding man (in all other areas except this one); I believe that Paterno did not hear that Sandusky was committing rape. I believe if Paterno knew the severity of what was happening, he would have reported it to the police, or at the very least confronted Sandusky and advised him to turn himself in. Secondly, Paterno did not know Sandusky to be this alleged monster, but instead probably thought of him as a close friend. Maybe it was impossible for Paterno to imagine his friend committing these heinous acts. Maybe that is why Paterno believed it was less serious than it actually was. It might have been unimaginable that his friend could be doing these things. Personally, I would struggle with reports of my close friends committing such disturbing things. I can honestly say that my first reaction would be disbelief. I would simply not believe it if someone were to tell me something like this about one of my good friends. I certainly hope to never receive a report like this, but if I did, it would be extremely difficult and I don’t know that my reaction could be predicted, even with the best of intentions.

I believe there is a difference between a mistake and an act done with malice. Paterno did not act as a bad man. He is not a bad man. His history alone tells you this. He made a mistake. His judgment may have been suspect, but Sandusky was the bad actor here. Paterno was not acting in a way to cover up and promote this abuse. I think that is something that is missing in all of the reporting. People are reacting to Paterno’s actions as if it was a cover-up. I have serious doubts about that and from what we know he reported it, and did not cover it up.

I have also heard numerous people say that had they been McQueary, they would have immediately gone into the shower and caused some sort of harm to Sandusky. I call BS. I do believe there is a subset of individuals who would have that reaction, but many and more would not. I cannot know exactly what McQueary was thinking at that very moment, but I can only imagine he was in a state of shock. McQueary is a State College guy and grew up around the program. He played quarterback for Penn State in the late 90’s and has stayed on as coach. At the time of this incident, he was a graduate assistant making his way up the coaching chain. He witnessed a man he knew to be a huge part of the Penn State football program doing something more disturbing than most any of us will ever witness first-hand. He freaked out. I cannot say for sure I would have done anything differently if I were in his shoes. I’d like to believe that I would be the tough guy who runs in and beats the crap out of Sandusky right there, but given the situation, I just don’t know. McQueary should have reported this to the police because he witnessed a violent crime, but I can see how he may have felt as though he’d be sacrificing his career and everything he knew by doing so. Again – I do not condone it, I am just trying to understand his point of view. He had a first-hand visual account of the incident and was best suited to report it to the police. He made a mistake in not doing so. As a Penn State fan, I really wish he had.

Now – am I still a Penn State fan? I’m still not positive (the rate at which news is coming out I would not be surprised to hear something soon that forces me to detach myself), but I think yes. Penn State is an amazing place. The football team has brought me a tremendous amount of joy (and heartache) throughout my life. I have created a tradition with my friend Jon of going to State College each year to see a home game and those weekends have become great, cherished memories. I was in attendance two weeks ago when Joe Paterno coached his last game at Penn State (no one knew this fact at the time) and became the winningest coach in Division 1 history. I had a great time that weekend. Penn State and the town of State College has been Happy Valley to hundreds of thousands of individuals. It is a majestic place. We know that no place is perfect and that has hit the Penn State community hard. What was an idealistic place in the heart of Pennsylvania has forever lost its innocence. It has been rocked by this scandal, but I think, and hope it can persevere.

It must be remembered that this controversy involves the sick, sadistic actions by a single individual. If these allegations are true, he should be punished accordingly. Those who learned of these actions did not act in the best possible manner and they have suffered the consequences and should suffer more if the individuals perjured themselves before the Grand Jury. Penn State, however, was not and is not a breeding ground for pedophiles. This was not a grand scheme to allow Sandusky access to kids. This was terrible acts on the part of a single man and the failure to properly deal with these actions by other individuals.

Those who were told of the incident made an omission – a serious one. They have been removed. Joe Paterno had to leave. The whirlwind that began a few days ago was getting worse and worse. There is no way he could have or should have been coaching the team at this point. The administrators (Curley, Schultz, Spanier) also were correctly let go. This was an administrative omission that should never have occurred. The only way Penn State can move forward is with a clean slate. That is happening. I cannot imagine the remainder of this coaching staff remaining part of the Penn State football program after this season. So many of them have been around for decades – from a time when Sandusky was still a coach. While they may never have known about these acts, they are forever tainted. This is unfortunate for the players and the coaches themselves who have no wrongdoing on their hands, but in order to move on, the taint must be removed.

Penn State football, and the school as a whole will be able to start anew with this purge, but it must be remembered that all of the innocent people harmed by Sandusky will be unable to start anew. That is the travesty. I feel terrible for these kids and their families. All of my prayers and wishes go out to them. It pains me to know that the school known for being Happy Valley will forever be associated with the acts of a single terrible person. Using hindsight, it is clear Joe Paterno should have done more than he did, but he was not the monster here. It saddens me to no end that he is going out like this. After 60+ years of doing incredible things for the school and the people encompassing it, one failure is what he will be remembered for.

I will be rooting for Penn State this weekend against Nebraska. There are 125 guys on that team that weren’t even in high school when this occurred. They have worked hard and played with integrity – the Penn State way. I will continue to be a fan of the football team and I plan on making my annual pilgrimage to State College in 2012. I hope and pray that the school’s newly selected administrators and the new Penn State football coach can return this program to its previous highs and continue the tradition of Success with Honor.

Outstanding iOS Flaws

1. Indication of Outstanding Notifications

Let me get this out of the way: the new notifications in iOS are great. The improvement over the previous system is tenfold. But there remain a couple of flaws.

First and foremost, is what happens when a user misses a banner notification or acts on (or unlocks) a lock screen notification. The answer is, nothing. If the phone is sitting on my desk at the home screen and a notification is missed it could be a while before it’s realized.

The problem is that while the notification is stored in the handy pulldown menu, there is no indication that there are still notifications that have not been acted on. It seems like some sort of indication (e.g., changing the color of the clock, the background of the status bar, adding another icon to the right corner, some little subtle glowing of text) would be simple and sufficient. Instead a user is left wondering if something was missed.

2. Deleting Notifications

The second flaw with Notification Center lies with deleting notifications from the pulldown menu. There seem to be three ways to delete things from the pulldown menu.

  1. Act on this notification directly from Notification Center.
  2. Launch the application from the home screen and act on the content related to the notification.
  3. Click the little grey button in the top right of the applications notification area and delete all notifications.

From what I can tell, the first two options only clear the specific notification for the individual action that triggered it. The third option clears all notifications for the given application. And herein lies the problem.

First and foremost, it seems odd that all notifications have to be cleared, or none of them can. An argument could be made that once a notification has been seen it has served it’s purpose, but if that were the logic than why would Apple keep notifications there even after a banner has been shown? It seems like the logical thing would have been to also include a swipe gesture to delete individual notifications. This would have allowed things to selectively be deleted and possibly also make them easier to delete since the little grey ‘X’ is sometimes a challenge.

3. Cannot Hide Newsstand Application

One of Apple’s additions to iOS 5 is the Newsstand Application. This application is basically iBooks, but for newspapers and magazines. I am sure there are some people who will use this, but I am not one of them. I don’t plan to buy newspapers or magazines on my iOS devices, and because of Apple’s decision not to allow users to delete Apple default applications there is nothing to do but hide this in a folder. But there is a problem with Newsstand. Apparently, it is a folder. And because you can’t put a folder in a folder there is nothing you can do about it, officially.

Some wily individual came up with a workaround that involves some fast fingers and some luck. This effectively breaks Newsstand so you can only do this if you don’t plan to use it at all.

4. No Quick Toggle For Bluetooth or Wifi

Much like copy and paste was for some people, I continue to bang my head against the wall regarding the inability to quickly toggle WiFi or Bluetooth on/off. WiFi requires a user to launch Settings.app and then click the WiFi item and then turn it on or off. Not horribly far to go, but not perfect.

Bluetooth is another story. A user has to launch Settings.app, then scroll down to General, then click Bluetooth and then toggle it on or off. This is so cumbersome that I rarely turn Bluetooth off (since I use it at least twice a day) and therefore impact my battery life. My solution for this is to add options in the multitasking bar as your scroll to the left, much like iPod controls, screen orientation and volume. It seems so simple to add buttons for WiFi and Bluetooth to this section.